Scheda di dettaglio – i prodotti della ricerca

DatoValore
TitleCausal networks of phytoplankton diversity and biomass are modulated by environmental context
AbstractUntangling causal links and feedbacks among biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and environmental factors is challenging due to their complex and context-dependent interactions (e.g., a nutrient-dependent relationship between diversity and biomass). Consequently, studies that only consider separable, unidirectional effects can produce divergent conclusions and equivocal ecological implications. To address this complexity, we use empirical dynamic modeling to assemble causal networks for 19 natural aquatic ecosystems (N24o~N58o) and quantified strengths of feedbacks among phytoplankton diversity, phytoplankton biomass, and environmental factors. Through a cross-system comparison, we identify macroecological patterns; in more diverse, oligotrophic ecosystems, biodiversity effects are more important than environmental effects (nutrients and temperature) as drivers of biomass. Furthermore, feedback strengths vary with productivity. In warm, productive systems, strong nitrate-mediated feedbacks usually prevail, whereas there are strong, phosphate-mediated feedbacks in cold, less productive systems. Our findings, based on recovered feedbacks, highlight the importance of a network view in future ecosystem management.
SourceNature communications 13 (1140)
Keywordsbiodiversityecosystem functioningphytoplankton
JournalNature communications
EditorNature Publishing Group., London, Regno Unito
Year2022
TypeArticolo in rivista
DOI10.1038/s41467-022-33702-1
AuthorsChang, Chun-Wei; Miki, Takeshi; Ye, Hao; Souissi, Sami; Adrian, Rita; Anneville, Orlane; Agasild, Helen; Ban, Syuhei; Be'eri-Shlevin, Yaron; Chiang, Yin-Ru; Feuchtmayr, Heidrun; Gal, Gideon; Ichise, Satoshi; Kagami, Maiko; Kumagai, Michio; Liu, Xin; Matsuzaki, Shin-Ichiro S.; Manca, Marina M.; Noges, Peeter; Piscia, Roberta; Rogora, Michela; Shiah, Fuh-Kwo; Thackeray, Stephen J.; Widdicombe, Claire E.; Wu, Jiunn-Tzong; Zohary, Tamar; Hsieh, Chih-hao
Text477114 2022 10.1038/s41467 022 33702 1 ISI Web of Science WOS 000864193100004 biodiversity ecosystem functioning phytoplankton Causal networks of phytoplankton diversity and biomass are modulated by environmental context Chang, Chun Wei; Miki, Takeshi; Ye, Hao; Souissi, Sami; Adrian, Rita; Anneville, Orlane; Agasild, Helen; Ban, Syuhei; Be eri Shlevin, Yaron; Chiang, Yin Ru; Feuchtmayr, Heidrun; Gal, Gideon; Ichise, Satoshi; Kagami, Maiko; Kumagai, Michio; Liu, Xin; Matsuzaki, Shin Ichiro S.; Manca, Marina M.; Noges, Peeter; Piscia, Roberta; Rogora, Michela; Shiah, Fuh Kwo; Thackeray, Stephen J.; Widdicombe, Claire E.; Wu, Jiunn Tzong; Zohary, Tamar; Hsieh, Chih hao 1 National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taipei 10617, Taiwan. 2 Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan. 3 Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Shiga 520 2194, Japan. 4 Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan. 5 Center for Biodiversity Science, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Shiga 520 2194, Japan. 6 Health Science Center Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. 7 Univ. Lille, CNRS, Univ, Littoral Cote D Opale, IRD, UMR 8187, LOG Laboratoire D Oceanologie et de Geosciences, Station Marine de Wimereux, F 59000 Lille, France. 8 Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, IGB, 12587 Berlin, Germany. 9 Freie Universitat Berlin, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, 14195 Berlin, Germany. 10 National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment INRAE , CARRTEL, Universite Savoie Mont Blanc, 74200 Thonon les Bains, France. 11 Centre for Limnology, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5D, 51014 Tartu, Estonia. 12 Department of Ecosystem Studies, School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone 522 8533 Shiga, Japan. 13 Kinneret Limnological Laboratory, Israel Oceanographic Limnological Research, P.O. Box 447, 14950 Migdal, Israel. 14 Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan. 15 UK Centre for Ecology Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4AP, UK. 16 Lake Biwa Environmental Research Institute, Otsu 520 0022, Japan. 17 Faculty of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240 8502 Kanagawa, Japan. 18 Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Toho University, Funabashi, Chiba 274 8510, Japan. 19 Research Center for Lake Biwa Environmental Innovation, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu 525 0058 Shiga, Japan. 20 Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16 2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305 8506, Japan. 21 CNR Water Research Institute IRSA , L.go Tonolli 50, 28922 Verbania, Pallanza, Italy. 22 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, West Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, UK. 23 Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan Untangling causal links and feedbacks among biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and environmental factors is challenging due to their complex and context dependent interactions e.g., a nutrient dependent relationship between diversity and biomass . Consequently, studies that only consider separable, unidirectional effects can produce divergent conclusions and equivocal ecological implications. To address this complexity, we use empirical dynamic modeling to assemble causal networks for 19 natural aquatic ecosystems N24o N58o and quantified strengths of feedbacks among phytoplankton diversity, phytoplankton biomass, and environmental factors. Through a cross system comparison, we identify macroecological patterns; in more diverse, oligotrophic ecosystems, biodiversity effects are more important than environmental effects nutrients and temperature as drivers of biomass. Furthermore, feedback strengths vary with productivity. In warm, productive systems, strong nitrate mediated feedbacks usually prevail, whereas there are strong, phosphate mediated feedbacks in cold, less productive systems. Our findings, based on recovered feedbacks, highlight the importance of a network view in future ecosystem management. 13 Published version Articolo in rivista Nature Publishing Group. 2041 1723 Nature communications Nature communications Nature communications marinamarcella.manca MANCA MARINA MARCELLA roberta.piscia PISCIA ROBERTA michela.rogora ROGORA MICHELA