| Text | 468987 2021 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117099 Scopus 2 s2.0 85105896436 emerging contaminants mass spectrometry drinking water What s in the water Target and suspect screening of contaminants of emerging concern in raw water and drinking water from Europe and Asia Troger R.; Ren H.; Yin D.; Postigo C.; Nguyen P.D.; Baduel C.; Golovko O.; Been F.; Joerss H.; Boleda M.R.; Polesello S.; Roncoroni M.; Taniyasu S.; Menger F.; Ahrens L.; Lai F.Y.; Wiberg K. Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU , Box 7050, Uppsala, SE, 750 07, aDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU , Box 7050, SE 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden, , Sweden; Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, bKey Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China, , , , China; Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, bKey Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China, , , , China; Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, bKey Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China, , , , China; Water, Environmental, and Food Chemistry Unit ENFOCHEM , Department of Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research IDAEA CSIC , Carrer Jordi Girona 18 26, Barcelona, 08034, cWater, Environmental, and Food Chemistry Unit ENFOCHEM , Department of Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research IDAEA CSIC , Carrer Jordi Girona 18 26, Barcelona, 08034, Spain, , Spain; Centre Asiatique de Recherche sur l Eau, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam National University of Ho Chi Minh City, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet, District 10Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City, dCentre Asiatique de Recherche sur l Eau, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet, District 10; Vietnam National University of Ho Chi Minh City, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, , , Viet Nam; Centre Asiatique de Recherche sur l Eau, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam National University of Ho Chi Minh City, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet, District 10Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City, dCentre Asiatique de Recherche sur l Eau, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet, District 10; Vietnam National University of Ho Chi Minh City, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, , , Viet Nam; UniversiteGrenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Grenoble, IGE, 38 050, eUniversiteGrenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38 050 Grenoble, France, , , , , France; UniversiteGrenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Grenoble, IGE, 38 050, eUniversiteGrenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38 050 Grenoble, France, , , , , France; UniversiteGrenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Grenoble, IGE, 38 050, eUniversiteGrenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38 050 Grenoble, France, , , , , France; UniversiteGrenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Grenoble, IGE, 38 050, eUniversiteGrenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38 050 Grenoble, France, , , , , France; University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zatisi 728/II, Vodnany, CZ 389 25, fUniversity of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zatisi 728/II, CZ 389 25, Vodnany, Czech Republic, , Czech Republic; KWR Water Research Institute, Nieuwegein, 3430BB, gKWR Water Research Institute, 3430BB Nieuwegein, The Netherlands, , Netherlands; Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute of Coastal Research, Geesthacht, 21502, hHelmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute of Coastal Research, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany, , Germany; Aigues de Barcelona EMGCIA S.A, General Batet 1 7, Barcelona, 08028, iAigues de Barcelona EMGCIA S.A, General Batet 1 7, 08028, Barcelona, Spain, , Spain; Water Research Institute CNR IRSA , via del Mulino 19, Brugherio MB , 20861, jWater Research Institute CNR IRSA , via del Mulino 19, 20861 Brugherio MB , Italy, , Italy; Lereti S.p.A., Via Somigliana 10 22100 Como, kLereti S.p.A., Via Somigliana 10 22100 Como, Italy, , Italy; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology AIST , 16 1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305 8569, lNNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology AIST , 16 1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305 8569, Japan, , Japan There is growing worry that drinking water can be affected by contaminants of emerging concern CECs , potentially threatening human health. In this study, a wide range of CECs n = 177 , including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, perfluoroalkyl substances PFASs and other compounds, were analysed in raw water and in drinking water collected from drinking water treatment plants DWTPs in Europe and Asia n = 13 . The impact of human activities was reflected in large numbers of compounds detected n = 115 and high variation in concentrations in the raw water range 15 7995 ng L for CECs . The variation was less pronounced in drinking water, with total concentration ranging from 35 to 919 ng L. Treatment efficiency was on average 65 ± 28%, with wide variation between different DWTPs. The DWTP with the highest CEC concentrations in raw water had the most efficient treatment procedure average treatment efficiency 89% , whereas the DWTP with the lowest CEC concentration in the raw water had the lowest average treatment efficiency 2.3% . Suspect screening was performed for 500 compounds ranked high as chemicals of concern for drinking water, using a prioritisation tool SusTool . Overall, 208 features of interest were discovered and three were confirmed with reference standards. There was co variation between removal efficiency in DWTPs for the target compounds and the suspected features detected using suspect screening, implying that removal of known contaminants can be used to predict overall removal of potential CECs for drinking water production. Our results can be of high value for DWTPs around the globe in their planning for future treatment strategies to meet the increasing concern about human exposure to unknown CECs present in their drinking water. 198 Published version http //www.scopus.com/record/display.url eid=2 s2.0 85105896436 origin=inward articolo articolo 2021_Troger_etal_NTS.pdf Articolo in rivista Pergamon Press. 0043 1354 Water research Oxf. Water research Oxf. Water res. Oxf. Water research. Oxf. stefano.polesello POLESELLO STEFANO |
