Scheda di dettaglio – i prodotti della ricerca

DatoValore
TitleExpanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring
AbstractBioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes (bacteria, archaea and protists) are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems.
SourceWater research (Oxf.) 191
Keywordsbiomonitoringfreshwater
JournalWater research (Oxf.)
EditorPergamon Press., New York, Regno Unito
Year2020
TypeArticolo in rivista
AuthorsM Sagova-Mareckova, J Boenigk, A Bouchez, K Cermakova, T Chonova, T Cordier, Ursula Eisendle, Tina Elersek, Stefano Fazi, T Fleituch, L Frühe, M Gajdosova, N Graupner, Arne Hägerbäumer, AM Kelly, J Kopecky, F Leese, P Nõges, S Orlic, K Panksep, J Pawlowski, A Petrusek, JJ Piggott, JC Rusch, R Salis, Janina Schenk, K Simek, A Stovicek, DA Strand, MI Vasquez, T Vrålstad, S Zlatkovic, M Zupancic, T Stoeck
Text448054 2020 biomonitoring freshwater Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring M Sagova Mareckova, J Boenigk, A Bouchez, K Cermakova, T Chonova, T Cordier, Ursula Eisendle, Tina Elersek, Stefano Fazi, T Fleituch, L Fruhe, M Gajdosova, N Graupner, Arne Hagerbaumer, AM Kelly, J Kopecky, F Leese, P Nõges, S Orlic, K Panksep, J Pawlowski, A Petrusek, JJ Piggott, JC Rusch, R Salis, Janina Schenk, K Simek, A Stovicek, DA Strand, MI Vasquez, T Vrålstad, S Zlatkovic, M Zupancic, T Stoeck Dept. of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcka 129, Prague 6, 16500, Czechia b Biodiversity, University of Duisburg Essen, Universitaetsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany c UMR CARRTEL, INRAE, UMR Carrtel, 75 av. de Corzent, FR 74203 Thonon les Bains cedex, France; University Savoie Mont Blanc, UMR CARRTEL, FR 73370 Le Bourget du Lac, France d ID Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 15, av. Secheron, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland e Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Science III, 4 Boulevard d Yvoy, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland f University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria g National Institute of Biology, Vecna pot 111, SI 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia h Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy IRSA CNR , Via Salaria km 29,300 C.P. 10, 00015 Monterotondo St., Rome, Italy i Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31 120 Krakow, Poland j Ecology Group, Technische Universitat Kaiserslautern, D 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany k Dept. of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vini na 7, 12844 Prague, Czechia l Dept. of Animal Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany m School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, D02 PN40, Ireland n Epidemiology and Ecology of Microoganisms, Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507, 16106 Prague 6, Czechia o Aquatic Ecosystem Resarch, University of Duisburg Essen, Universitaetsstrasse 5 D 45141 Essen, Germany p Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu 51006, Estonia q Institute Ru er Bo kovi , Bijeni ka 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; Center of Excellence for Science and Technology Integrating Mediterranean, Bijeni ka 54,10 000 Zagreb, Croatia r Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Powsta cow Warszawy 55, 81 712 Sopot, Poland s Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, Sentrum, NO 0106 Oslo, Norway t Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, NO 0316 Oslo, Norway u Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Lund University, Solvegatan 37, 223 62 Lund, Sweden v Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre CAS, Brani ovska 31, 370 05 eske Bud jovice, Czechia w Department of Chemical Engineering, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Arch. Kyprianos Str., 3036 Limassol, Cyprus x Ministry of Environmental Protection, Omladinskih brigada 1, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia; Agency Akvatorija , 11. kraji ke divizije 49, 11090 Belgrade, Serbia Bioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes bacteria, archaea and protists are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems. 191 Published version Articolo in rivista Pergamon Press. 0043 1354 Water research Oxf. Water research Oxf. Water res. Oxf. Water research. Oxf. stefano.fazi FAZI STEFANO