Scheda di dettaglio – i prodotti della ricerca

DatoValore
TitleBayesian Belief Network to support conflict analysis for groundwater protection: the case of the Apulia region
AbstractWater resource management is often characterized by conflicts, as a result of the heterogeneity of interests associated with a shared resource. Many water conflicts arise on a global scale and, in particular, an increasing level of conflicts can be observed in the Mediterranean basin, characterized by water scarcity. In the present work, in order to assist the conflict analysis process, and thus outline a proper groundwater management, stakeholders were involved in the process and suitable tools were used in a Mediterranean area (the Apulia region, in Italy). In particular, this paper seeks to elicit and structure farmers' mental models influencing their decision over the main water source for irrigation. The more crucial groundwater is for farmers' objectives, the more controversial is the groundwater protection strategy. Bayesian Belief Networks were developed to simulate farmers' behavior with regard to groundwater management and to assess the impacts of protection strategy. These results have been used to calculate the conflict degree in the study area, derived from the introduction of policies for the reduction of groundwater exploitation for irrigation purposes. The less acceptable the policy is, the more likely it is that conflict will develop between farmers and the Regional Authority. The results of conflict analysis were also used to contribute to the debate concerning potential conflict mitigation measures. The approach adopted in this work has been discussed with a number of experts in groundwater management policies and irrigation management, and its main strengths and weaknesses have been identified. Increasing awareness of the existence of potential conflicts and the need to deal with them can be seen as an interesting initial shift in the Apulia region's water management regime, which is still grounded in merely technical approaches.
SourceJournal of environmental management 115, pp. 136–146
KeywordsCognitive MapBayesian Belief NetworkConflict analysisGroundwater protection
JournalJournal of environmental management
EditorAcademic Press., New York, Regno Unito
Year2013
TypeArticolo in rivista
DOI10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.011
AuthorsR. Giordano1, D. D'Agostino2, C. Apollonio3, N. Lamaddalena2, M. Vurro1
Text198600 2013 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.011 Cognitive Map Bayesian Belief Network Conflict analysis Groundwater protection Bayesian Belief Network to support conflict analysis for groundwater protection the case of the Apulia region R. Giordano1, D. D Agostino2, C. Apollonio3, N. Lamaddalena2, M. Vurro1 1National Research Council Water Research Institute, via De Blasio, 5 70123, Bari, Italy 2CIHEAM Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Via Ceglie, 9 70010 Valenzano BA , Italy 3Politecnico di Bari DICATECh, Via E. Orabona 4 70125 Bari, Italy Water resource management is often characterized by conflicts, as a result of the heterogeneity of interests associated with a shared resource. Many water conflicts arise on a global scale and, in particular, an increasing level of conflicts can be observed in the Mediterranean basin, characterized by water scarcity. In the present work, in order to assist the conflict analysis process, and thus outline a proper groundwater management, stakeholders were involved in the process and suitable tools were used in a Mediterranean area the Apulia region, in Italy . In particular, this paper seeks to elicit and structure farmers mental models influencing their decision over the main water source for irrigation. The more crucial groundwater is for farmers objectives, the more controversial is the groundwater protection strategy. Bayesian Belief Networks were developed to simulate farmers behavior with regard to groundwater management and to assess the impacts of protection strategy. These results have been used to calculate the conflict degree in the study area, derived from the introduction of policies for the reduction of groundwater exploitation for irrigation purposes. The less acceptable the policy is, the more likely it is that conflict will develop between farmers and the Regional Authority. The results of conflict analysis were also used to contribute to the debate concerning potential conflict mitigation measures. The approach adopted in this work has been discussed with a number of experts in groundwater management policies and irrigation management, and its main strengths and weaknesses have been identified. Increasing awareness of the existence of potential conflicts and the need to deal with them can be seen as an interesting initial shift in the Apulia region s water management regime, which is still grounded in merely technical approaches. 115 Bayesian Belief Network to support conflict analysis for groundwater protection the case of the Apulia region 1_s2_0_S0301479712005968_main.pdf Articolo in rivista Academic Press. 0301 4797 Journal of environmental management Journal of environmental management J. environ. manag. raffaele.giordano GIORDANO RAFFAELE michele.vurro VURRO MICHELE