Scheda di dettaglio – i prodotti della ricerca

DatoValore
TitleChemical-monitoring on-site exercises to harmonize analytical methods for priority substances in the European Union
AbstractIn support of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000/60/EC), three intercomparison exercises were carried out on European rivers (Po, Danube and Meuse) in order to assess the current state of monitoring methodologies. Laboratories from European Union (EU) Member States (MSs) were invited to gather at the selected EU river and sample together, each laboratory with its own method. Participants simultaneously sampled the river water and analyzed according to their protocols. A selection of priority substances (PSs) [i.e. polybromodiphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and alkyl phenols (APs)] included in Directive 2008/105/EC were analyzed in standard solutions, extracts from river waters and riverwater samples in order to investigate variabilities in different steps of the analytical process. Concentrations measured in river samples using WFD-monitoring protocols showed that even some of the most challengingWFD PSs (e.g., PAHs, PBDEs and APs) can be measured at WFD-relevant concentrations with methods currently applied in MSs, but variability is still too great and not all laboratories meet required limits of quantification. Hindrance to the implementation of the monitoring requirements is therefore not the technical feasibility of analysis at these concentration levels, but rather communication, knowledge exchange and harmonization among the laboratories involved.
SourceTrAC. Trends in analytical chemistry (Ref. ed., Print) 36, pp. 25–35
KeywordsChemical monitoringPriority substanceRiver waterWFD
JournalTrAC. Trends in analytical chemistry (Ref. ed., Print)
EditorElsevier, Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi
Year2012
TypeArticolo in rivista
AuthorsHanke G., Polesello S., Mariani G., Comero S., Wollgast J., Castro-Jiménez J., Patrolecco L., Valsecchi S., Rusconi M., Ademollo N., Bidoglio G.
Text190701 2012 Scopus 2 s2.0 84861479720 Chemical monitoring Priority substance River water WFD Chemical monitoring on site exercises to harmonize analytical methods for priority substances in the European Union Hanke G., Polesello S., Mariani G., Comero S., Wollgast J., Castro Jimenez J., Patrolecco L., Valsecchi S., Rusconi M., Ademollo N., Bidoglio G. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, T.P. 290, European Commission Joint Research Centre JRC , I 21027 Ispra VA , Italy IRSA CNR, Via del Mulino 19, 20861 Brugherio MB , Italy Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, T.P. 202, European Commission Joint Research Centre JRC , I 21027 Ispra VA , Italy IDAEA CSIC, Jordi Girona, 18 26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain IRSA CNR, Via Salaria Km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo Scalo Roma , Italy In support of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive WFD, 2000/60/EC , three intercomparison exercises were carried out on European rivers Po, Danube and Meuse in order to assess the current state of monitoring methodologies. Laboratories from European Union EU Member States MSs were invited to gather at the selected EU river and sample together, each laboratory with its own method. Participants simultaneously sampled the river water and analyzed according to their protocols. A selection of priority substances PSs i.e. polybromodiphenyl ethers PBDEs , polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PAHs and alkyl phenols APs included in Directive 2008/105/EC were analyzed in standard solutions, extracts from river waters and riverwater samples in order to investigate variabilities in different steps of the analytical process. Concentrations measured in river samples using WFD monitoring protocols showed that even some of the most challengingWFD PSs e.g., PAHs, PBDEs and APs can be measured at WFD relevant concentrations with methods currently applied in MSs, but variability is still too great and not all laboratories meet required limits of quantification. Hindrance to the implementation of the monitoring requirements is therefore not the technical feasibility of analysis at these concentration levels, but rather communication, knowledge exchange and harmonization among the laboratories involved. 36 Published version Articolo Pubblicato Pubblicazione Internazionale ISI TRAC_2012_Chemical_monitoring_on_site_exercises.pdf Articolo in rivista Elsevier 0167 2940 TrAC. Trends in analytical chemistry Ref. ed., Print TrAC. Trends in analytical chemistry Ref. ed., Print TrAC, Trends anal. chem. Ref. ed., Print TrAC. Ref. ed., Print Trends in analytical chemistry Library edition Ref. ed., Print RUSCONI MARIANNA nicoletta.ademollo ADEMOLLO NICOLETTA stefano.polesello POLESELLO STEFANO luisa.patrolecco PATROLECCO LUISA saramaria.valsecchi VALSECCHI SARA MARIA TA.P04.021.007 Diffusione, ripartizione, bioaccumulo e trasformazione di inquinanti in ecosistemi acquatici